|
|
Post by californiacro on Sept 23, 2007 8:41:12 GMT 1
Sanader on reasons why HDZ is against taxes on capital gains, real estateCAKOVEC, Sept 22 (Hina) -
The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) leader Ivo Sanader has repeatedly opposed the idea of levying a tax on capital gains, explaining that the introduction of this type of tax would affect not only citizens investing in shares, but also 1.3 million members of mandatory pension funds and 150,000 members of open-end investment funds.
|
|
|
|
Post by justapixel on Sept 24, 2007 0:13:31 GMT 1
Pension funds problem can easily be handled by giving them a special status. As for open end investment funds, it's only fair to tax ones' profit. BTW, most of my savings are in such funds.
.
|
|
|
|
Post by californiacro on Sept 24, 2007 4:24:34 GMT 1
Pension funds problem can easily be handled by giving them a special status. As for open end investment funds, it's only fair to tax ones' profit. BTW, most of my savings are in such funds. . I think they should also but not yet. The economy is not good enough. |
|
|
|
Post by justapixel on Sept 24, 2007 8:35:52 GMT 1
I think they should also but not yet. The economy is not good enough. For economy, it's better to tax those who are not producing than businesses. At the present level of fund investment returns, no investors will be deterred by taxes alone. . |
|
|
|
Post by solitum on Oct 9, 2007 9:37:42 GMT 1
why don't make combination
Capital gain tax apply to investment in companies which are older than 3 years only.
In this way you make it attractive to investment in new companies, where of course also the risk is grater, maybe they could even make intelligent solution where the rule out that the re-opening of company under other MB number and also take into consideration number of jobs created e.g by measuring the income tax paid by employees in these new companies.
this i think could stimulate the economy in a very positive direction.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by valiant on Nov 27, 2007 22:15:07 GMT 1
they are against taxing because they want to win the election. thats one reason. other reasons include helping out their business buddies.
|
|
|
|
Post by ray51 on Jul 11, 2008 23:32:38 GMT 1
Many other countries have NIL CGT ( Belgium included ) ; some others allow Capital Losses to be exempt from future taxation ;
all such steps call for v. v. much more expertise , than can be witnessed on Dnevnik and similar programs !
Not to mention the appropriate legislation concerning Life Assurance policies and Bonds , discretionary Trusts , dividends , bank interest etc etc
|
|
|
|
Post by maslina on May 22, 2009 6:35:18 GMT 1
but a 22% vat is fine?
|
|
|
|
Post by ray51 on May 22, 2009 8:49:19 GMT 1
Many argue that any VAT is unjust ;
yet , you are still "lucky" in that so many categories are still VAT-exempt in HR ;
if ever HR gets admitted into the EU-club , expect urgent introduction of VAT on all such items , plus a good number of other mad taxes , some already in place and strictly enforced in the EU ,
the others : being invented , developed and legislated in Brux , as we write this , hehehe...
|
|
