|
|
Post by darcy on Mar 19, 2007 6:07:03 GMT 1
A colleague of mine I used to work with have sent to me a link to a document I found very interesting reading if you hit any problem in relation with residency, investing or running a business in CRO. The document is from a reliable source (not from a dodgy real estate agent or illiterate lawyer), but you should triple check all the facts first. siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCROATIA/Resources/fias-english.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by Carol on Mar 19, 2007 10:11:45 GMT 1
I wonder who Darcy thinks is a "dodgy" estate agent?!
The report was written in 2002. Very accurate I'd say. And I can't see much has changed in 5 years. I think the problem is on the first page... the world bank has failed convince Croatia that foreign direct investment is a good thing! Crazy i know but if you have never travelled, then you can just live comfortably with a narrow view of the world.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mirko on Mar 19, 2007 11:32:13 GMT 1
Please do not mentioned The World Bank, created to exploit poor nations, IMO. It is good that Argentina recently told them to get stuffed, and does not want to deal with the organisation again.
|
|
|
|
Post by darcy on Mar 19, 2007 22:21:32 GMT 1
This report has nothing to do with the WB, they just paid for it.
Please look at it as a collection of facts (you have to check, of course) instead of blindly following advise from your real eastate agent or your laywer helping you with your transaction at the time.
I did not think at any moment that Carol was a dodgy real estate agent, but she IS a real estate agent, her interest IS to make a transation and we are all humans.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carol on Mar 20, 2007 7:51:23 GMT 1
Please do not mentioned The World Bank, created to exploit poor nations, IMO. It is good that Argentina recently told them to get stuffed, and does not want to deal with the organisation again. This sort of thinking is really intriguing. The quote was not 100% explicit, so maybe I'm guessing wrong... but are you saying mirko that coutries should not borrow money and pay it back with interest, but instead be gifted it when their previous allocation is spent? If so, who should be the benefactor and why should they do it? Charity? |
|
|
|
Post by darcy on Mar 20, 2007 23:10:12 GMT 1
I am sure Mirko was not thinking enough when we was writing his post.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear42 on Mar 25, 2007 0:37:40 GMT 1
Mirko,
I agree with you!!!!!
|
|
