|
Post by davidzg on Sept 5, 2005 22:14:00 GMT 1
Mr. Cheng I believe it's been running around 2 months, but tonight was my first visit.
Its easily the best Chinese restaurant in Zagreb, the food is excellent, the lazy Suzy tables are beautiful wood carved the whole ambience is very nice. The service was excellent, although it was by a local which I guess takes away from a Chinese restaurant slightly.
Whilst eating there 3 diplomats of Asian appearance came in so that's a good stamp of approval. Prices are very reasonable for 7 people, and we ate a lot it was less than 700 kunas.
It's on Radnicka in the Vmd building (the big new glass building) which is near Mercator.
|
|
|
Post by bright side on Sept 6, 2005 8:56:27 GMT 1
Hey, thanks! This is good news.  And I had no idea!  Have to go and twist some arms now. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Mr Happy on Sept 6, 2005 9:09:07 GMT 1
How do you know they were diplomats ? They could have been relatives out to make the place look impressive, and it obviously worked in your case ...
|
|
|
Post by mambo on Sept 6, 2005 10:25:47 GMT 1
That is indeed good news, will be by destination next time I am in Zagreb. And when you see chinese eating in a restaurant it definitely means it is authentic for them, otherwise you would not see them.
|
|
|
Post by davidzg on Sept 6, 2005 10:57:10 GMT 1
How do you know they were diplomats ? They could have been relatives out to make the place look impressive, and it obviously worked in your case ... The restaurant has large open windows and the car park is literally 2 metres from the inside, the blue licence plates kind of gave them away.  The fact that they are diplomats means very little, had they been French or German I wouldn't have mention it, the likelihood is they were Chinese diplomats, had I been in an Italian restaurant and Italian diplomats had entered I would have seen that as a good sign too.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Happy on Sept 6, 2005 12:49:06 GMT 1
Thanks for the extra info. I obviously asked the question based on what you said previously, rather than on what you didn't say. Therefore there was no need for your sarcasm was there. That is the sort of response that prevents people posting on here at all.
|
|
|
Post by davidzg on Sept 6, 2005 13:36:01 GMT 1
Thanks for the extra info. I obviously asked the question based on what you said previously, rather than on what you didn't say. Therefore there was no need for your sarcasm was there. That is the sort of response that prevents people posting on here at all. I didn't feel the need to explain every little detail, as most adults accept what is being said to them. You questioned it, I answered, let's move on.
|
|